• No questions for this search term

The New Demarchy Manifesto ("Politics without Politics")

  • Follow |   4

Summary

Modify

A proposal for distributed massively-parallel direct democracy, its method, and why we need it.

Wiki article

Compare versions Edit

Problems of electoral representative democracy

The world is entering a new era. Progress is accelerating, complexity is rising. The citizens of the world are increasingly more knowledgeable, smarter, and specialised. The decentralised decision making in our economic system is keeping pace but the current political system which empowers professional politicians to impose their policy preferences on citizens has become inadequate. Insufficient decentralisation results in unmanageable complexity, progress is slow, policy failure abound, not to mention populism, corruption, and public apathy. Declining political satisfaction combined with rising political interest mixes to an explosive cocktail.

Proposed statistical representative democracy

Improving on the age-old model of sortition democracy, by which the citizens of Ancient Athens and Serenissima Venice flourished and prospered, the internet now facilitates an improved form of decentralised self-governance by adding collective intelligence to the mix. Citizens are no more impotent subjects to those in power. They make all decisions themselves, in a participative and deliberative process performed by a large number of parallel representative sociodemographic samples from their midst.

The Rules of New Demarchy

  1. New Demarchy is a non-hierarchical, non-ideologic, and transnational organisation which competes with traditional parties for votes to establish democratic legitimacy on local and national levels.
  2. Decision making is decentralised and empowers all citizens, irrespective of membership in New Demarchy.
  3. Social or political innovators can submit proposals for the adoption, prolongation, or change of policies, public enterprises and other collective action to address problems in society. Rating will prioritise problems and proposals, including advantage and disadvantages.
  4. Collective intelligence is organised through parallel public and stratified prediction markets which collect and aggregate consensus forecasts for the future impact of proposed policy changes, and without a change.
  5. Citizens may participate voluntarily in the public prediction market with their best predictions in self-selected areas of knowledge or interest, participation in the stratified market is mandatory by invitation for a sufficiently powered sample of citzens, representative by gender, age, place, education, and income.
  6. Demarchic citizen juries consist of members appointed for the time required to arrive at a decision on a proposal or a bundle of interconnected proposals. Jury composition shall be sociodemographically representative of the directly and indirectly affected community.
  7. Appointment is by equal or weighted sortition from amongst the members affected by the decision, weighted with a probability pro-rata to each member’s forecasting track record in the decision topic. Citizen categories with opposing interests in a topic shall be represented in equal numbers.
  8. Jury size and supermajority requirement shall yield a 99 percent confidence level for the vote to be statistically equivalent to a majority decision of the entire affected population.
  9. A jury's information, deliberation, and decision phases shall be organised by a strictly neutral body.
  10. Each jury member except the moderator has one secret vote to be cast at sole discretion in the public interest of all citizens according to best personal knowledge and free conscience. Systemic consent principles apply to secure least resistance outcomes.
  11. Each decision shall be tracked by a prediction market on its expected future impact whether positively intended or negatively suffered.
  12. New Demarchy members holding public offices in a hosting democracy must pledge to vote always according to jury decisions, with the exception of grave reasons of conscience.

Advantages of New Demarchy

  • Legitimate -- New Demarchy is empowered by its vote share in each hosting democracy.
  • Neutral -- Decisions are statistically representative of the value judgements of all affected citizens.
  • Peaceful -- Conflicting interests compete in decision making without resorting to violence.
  • Honest -- The continuous change of qualified decision makers works against corruption.
  • Competent -- Jury appointments weighted by foresight increase the quality of decision making.
  • Scientific -- Decision quality verification by predicted impact follows the scientific principle.
  • Rational -- Special interests are decided on merit instead of elite power or populist majority.
  • Inclusive -- All citizens contribute knowledge and opinions for the broadest perspective.
  • Transnational -- New Demarchy can address problems which do not stop at national borders.

Disadvantages of New Demarchy

  • Engagement -- We do not just talk about political issues and problems, we must actively engage in the demarchic citizen jury, expected to be a single time in a lifetime.
  • Deliberation -- We cannot just parrot political slogans but must dig deeper into problems, their likely causes and potential solutions.
  • Time requirement -- Just ticking a ballot ticket every four years is insufficient, participation cognitive effort.

Vienna, November 2015

How can you help progress towards true democracy?

If you want to help: Welcome!

  • You can start by contributing your personal opinion whether demarchic democracy can work. Can it improve politics? How fast can we get it? Then post your predictions and reasons here: New demarchy foundation
  • You can join us at our next monthly New Demarchy Meetup meetup in Vienna.
  • You can point us to a political challenge as a next demonstrator project. Here is the impressive list of projects already done by the demarchic NewDemocracy Foundation in Australia.

Further information

The New Demarchy model is most indebted to Australian philosopher John Burnheim's solution of statistical representation as described in "Is Democracy Possible?". It adds to this model in three elements: First, it makes more use of knowledge in society as described by Austrian Nobel laureate Friedrich A. Hayek by collecting forecasts through a public prediction market. Second, in the spirit of Karl Popper it adds falsifiability to the collective decision framework. Measurement of good and bad collective decisions can achieved by comparing forecasts to empirical outcomes. Third, New Demarchy can be applied by a new or even existing political party. As such party rises through free elections this lends democratic legitimacy to its process. It also means that in all countries with free elections there is a clear implementation path for New Demarchy, contingent only on a reasonable budget.