• No questions for this search term

The New Demarchy Manifesto

Summary

Modify

A summary of New Demarchy, its rules, and why we need it.

Wiki article

Compare versions Edit

On the inadequacy of representative democracy

The world is entering a new era. Progress is accelerating, complexity is rising. The citizens of the world are increasingly more knowledgeable, smarter, and specialised. However, the model of representative democracy where an elite of elected few professional politicians decides matters of policy on behalf of the many citizens has become inadequte. Policy failure and incompetence abound, not to mention populism, corruption, and public apathy.

The alternative of direct democracy

Improving on the age-old model of sortition democracy, by which the citizens of Ancient Athens and Serenissima Venice flourished and prospered, the internet now facilitates a powerful improved form of direct self-governance, where citizens are no more powerless subjects to decisions by a few but make all decisions directly by themselves: New Demarchy.

Advantages of knowledge-based sortition

A collective intelligence mechanism empowers all citizens to contribute knowledge and opinions from the broadest perspective. Appointments proportionate to proven individual expertise increases the quality of decision making. Frequent change of qualified decision makers works against corruption. Special interests are decided on merit instead of elite lobbying or populist majority.

The principles of New Demarchy

  1. New Demarchy is a non-hierarchical democratic organisation guided by the collective intelligence of its body of members.
  2. Collective intelligence is organised through an open prediction market which collects and aggregates all participating members’ knowledge and forecasts.
  3. Members are free to ask prediction questions in all pertinent matters. They compete for expert rank with their best predictions in self-selected areas of expertise.
  4. Members are free to submit proposals for the adoption, change or abandoning of policies and matters of the state for a demarchic decision.
  5. Decision makers are appointed ad-hoc from amongst the members for no longer than to arrive at a decision or a group of interconnected decisions.
  6. Appointment is by meritocratic sortition, with a probability pro rata to each member’s empirical success with prediction market questions in the decision’s subject area.
  7. Depending on the magnitude or importance of the decision at hand, the decision maker is a single member or a group of three, five or seven members.
  8. Each decision maker may draw on experts from the prediction market or elsewhere and decides in the best interest of all citizens according to his or her free conscience.
  9. Each decision is documented by one or more prediction questions tracking its future impact.
  10. New Demarchy competes freely with traditional parties for voters’ support on all levels of the hosting democracies.
  11. Members holding public offices in a hosting democracy act in all their formally assigned responsibilities in full accordance to the decision makers' resolutions.

Vienna, November 2015


Further information

Versions

3 years ago
6 years, 6 months ago
6 years, 6 months ago
7 years, 11 months ago
8 years, 3 months ago
8 years, 3 months ago
8 years, 5 months ago
8 years, 5 months ago

Select two and

Quit comparison