Will New Demarchy produce better policy impact forecasts than professional politicians already in 2016?

Follow |   73
Recruiting
  1. Welcome. First, let us explain the four tasks in each question. This button will later bring you to the wiki with some background information to the question. Now please click the blue arrow > to continue.
  2. This button will show you the exact judgement rule which specifies how the question will be settled and the winner determined. You must accept the rule to unlock trading.
  3. Clicking here will open the trading section where you can then buy and sell predictions using your virtual credits.
  4. The last button will bring you to the market talk section. Try to convince other traders of your predictions with a good argument.
  5. The better your predictions are compared to other traders, the higher will be your share of the incentive.
  1. Welcome! First, please click the “book” icon to jump to a question's information wiki.
  1. Great! Now please click here to check the exact judgement rule.
  1. Now, let’s do your first trade together. Please click here.
  1. Last task: Now convince other traders of your answer to push its price.
  1. When finished, click here to proceed to the next question.
  2. Click here to return to the previous question.
  3. Click here to jump to any question directly.
  4. Continue to trade, talk, or rate before proceeding to the next question.
  • No questions for this search term
  1. This is how the question will be judged in the end, when the final outcome becomes known.
  2. This is the precise date or end of the period to which the question refers.
  3. After reading the judgement rule, please click here.
Close

§ Judgement rule

How will the final result of the question be determined?

Modify Final result
According to the manifesto, New Demarchy will capture policy impact predictions by politicians and run them as prediction questions on the prediction market. For some of these, final results will become available during 2016. We will divide the mean absolute errors (MAE) of the collective forecast of members on the prediction market by the MAE's of the responsible politicians. A constant of 100 % minus this ratio gives the performance indicator (PI). Hence a PI above 0 % will indicate an improvement, below 0 % a worse performance than politicians.
Reference date: Dec. 31, 2016, 24:00 CET

Answer options

Widget Price
● Worse (PI less than -5 %)
10.38 %
● Equal (PI +/- 5 %)
9.97 %
● Slightly better (PI +5 to +10 %)
40.69 %
● Better (PI +10 to +20 %)
30.69 %
● Significantly better (PI +20 to +30 %)
3.88 %
● A lot better (PI +30 to +50 %)
2.17 %
● Absolutely superior (PI of more than +50 %)
2.20 %

Price trend

Transactions
  1. Study the background information carefully.
  2. Read the background information carefully, before proceeding.

Wiki article

Edit

Objective

A key question for New Demarchy is which democratic variant produces the better decisions:

  • election of professional politicians as long-term political representatives
  • expertise-weighted sortition of citizens as atomistic decision makers

For the time being, before New Demarchy has achieved formal decision power, a proxy indicator is the direct comparison of the average error of politicians' and demarchic predictions.

President George W. Bush delivers remarks on the Fiscal Year 2008 budget - Copyright: The White HouseBackground

Professional politicians may announce their policy decisions concurrently with a statement of their expected desirable impact. There may be statements about undesirable effects too, and how these outweigh by the positive ones.

Irrespective of whether bad forecasts cause bad decisions, or ideological decisions are just being rationalised with bad forecasts: forecasts are empirically falsifiable in the sense of Austrian philosopher Karl Popper. They should be tracked and compared with final results to improve political accountability.

Professional politicians vs. demarchic decision makers

New Demarchy does not need professional politicians holding on to an office. All citizens appointed by expertise-weighted sortition continue their (non-political) profession once a decision is made.

All questions regarding the foundation decision:

Topics

Assign
  1. Offering the reason for your trade may convince other traders to follow your opinion.
  2. Click '+' if you agree, or '–' to disagree. You get a credit for every rating you make.
  3. For each '+' the author will get +100 credits added to his trading account .
  4. If you rate a comment with "-", please reply and state your objection.
  5. Now please rate, reply, or write your own comment. Best of luck!

Reasons and arguments Analyze

USD 10
Total prize money
Top 5 participants (Ranking) Credits
1. Banned user 23,859.39
2. guodong liu 14,627.69
3. Stuart Mercer 10,668.45
4. Arnold Scolnik 10,608.92
5. TravinJason Patterson 8,499.46
Photo Hubertus Hofkirchner
Question owner:
Hubertus Hofkirchner
  • 4,564 Views
  • 51 Messages
  • 248 Transactions
This question has 73 followers